USPTO serial 77024869
ADD NOTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADD NOTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clare, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Jones
ERIC T JONES REISING, ETHINGTON, BARNES, KISSELLE, PPO BOX 4390TROY, MI 48099-4390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Publication of printed matter, namely, brochures and pamphlets, via print, electronic, and digital media in the field of alcohol use prevention in youth and others; Production and distribution of audiovisual works namely, television shows, radio programs and motion pictures, via analog and digital distribution in the field of alcohol use prevention in youth and others; Publication of printed matter in the field of alcohol use prevention in youth and others; Entertainment Services namely, the production of audiovisual cinema ads and radio and television public service announcements in the field of alcohol use prevention in youth and others | ACTIVE | Sep 25, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |