CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ETRIEVE

USPTO serial 77034937

ETRIEVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETRIEVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander D. Forman

Alexander D. Forman Ice Miller LLPOne American Square, Suite 2900Indianapolis, IN 46282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Wireless telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, text messages and graphics to mobile telephones; electronic mail services featuring transmission and reception of e-mail between pop servers and wireless telecommunication equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 3, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 23, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 16, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 16, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance