USPTO serial 77038397
THE AUTHORITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE AUTHORITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller, Esq.
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and personal care products, namely, shaving cream, shaving gel, pre-shave oil preparations, non-medicated astringents, after shave lotion, facial and body cleanser, facial and body soap, facial moisturizer, face scrubs, body scrubs, foot creams, hand creams, skin toners, face masques, skin hydrators, anti-aging lotion, non-medicated eyecare products, namely, creams and lotions; sun care products, namely, sun care lotions and sun block; self tanners, skin lighteners, skin brighteners, antiperspirants and deodorants, hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, hair spray, hair color and hair pomades, talcum powder, body care products, namely, body lotions, body cream, body scrub, fragrances for personal use, hair removal preparations, body care preparations, tooth whiteners, lip balms, toothpaste, non-medicinal mouthwash, non-medicated gum rinses in the nature of non-medicated dental rinses for gums, breath freshener sprays, diluted breath sprays used as mouthwash, concentrated breath freshener sprays, travel size cosmetic and personal care products, namely, travel size shaving cream, shaving gel, pre-shave oil preparations, non-medicated astringents, after shave lotion, facial and body cleanser, facial and body soap, facial moisturizer, face scrubs, body scrubs, foot creams, hand creams, skin toners, face masques, skin hydrators, anti-aging lotion and cream, eye cream and lotion, and hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, hair spray, hair color and hair pomades; anti-aging products, namely, creams and lotions; facial products, namely, cleanser, soap, moisturizer, scrubs, toners, masques, lotions and creams; shave products, namely, shaving cream, shaving gel, pre-shave oil preparations, non-medicated astringents, after shave lotion; gift sets composed primarily of shaving cream, shaving gel, pre-shave oil preparations, non-medicated astringents, after shave lotion, facial and body cleanser, facial and body soap, facial moisturizer, face scrubs, body scrubs, foot creams, hand creams, skin toners, face masques, facial and body lotion, facial and body cream, non-medicated acne treatment preparations, hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, hair spray, hair color and hair pomades, skin hydrators, anti-aging lotion and cream, non-medicated eyecare lotion and cream, skin lighteners, and hair removal products, namely, depilatory creams; wipes and towelettes, namely, cosmetic cleansing pads and cosmetic moisturizing wipes; gradual self tanning moisturizer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |