CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BIOSOLINA

USPTO serial 77043961

BIOSOLINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOSOLINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen L. Liepmann

Karen L. Liepmann Stinson Morrison Hecker, LLP1850 North Central AvenueSuite 2100Phoenix, AZ 85004-4584

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Fuel cellsACTIVE—
042Research and development and technological consultation in the field of fuel cell systems and biofuel production, storage and distribution systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 7, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 10, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance