USPTO serial 77047982
PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP130 E RANDOLPH STSTE 350010052007CHICAGO, IL 60601-6314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software which supports a wide spectrum of business, scientific, engineering and analytical applications being run across a virtualized infrastructure by enabling the applications to request and use resources from a shared resource pool and which can be configured according to user defined business policies, which software can support most application types either directly or through application programming interfaces; software upon which various applications and services can be enabled to use the resources of many separate computers connected by a network, any scalable application that is able to make use of additional resources; software which can be configured through adaptive policies to conform to the end user's environment to allow an end user to specify how specific sources are to be used based on operational requirements; software which dynamically coordinates resources through its resource co-ordination and management capabilities and/or based on user defined policies and can be extended from servers to storage, license management and networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Support services for installation, configuration and implementation of systems infrastructure software to optimize its benefits to end users, namely, maximizing hardware infrastructure utilization and accelerating throughput of applications in a heterogeneous compute environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 9, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |