USPTO serial 77052188
TECHNOLOGIES THAT POWER YOUR DATA SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOLOGIES THAT POWER YOUR DATA SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orangeburg, NY
Orangeburg, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Gilman, Jeff Kaplan, Tim Gibson, Matt Dernier, Ed Pergament, Les Garmaise, Jason Ngui and Jon Doloff
MICHAEL R. GILMAN KAPLAN GILMAN GIBSON & DERNIER LLP900 US HIGHWAY 9 N STE 504WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095-1003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Barcode decoders, barcode scanners and scanner stands, bar code wands and wand stands, hand-held barcode scanners; hand-held computers; laser scanner with an automatic trigger and stand for laser scanners; thermal bar code label printing and label cutting apparatus sold together as a unit; data entry terminals; barcode slot readers; barcode printing software; portable data terminals; automatic ID collection software for personal and product identification; operation software for barcode and optical scanners; RFID Tag readers, writers and terminals; magnetic encoded card readers; optical character recognition readers; barcode scanning modules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |