Drawing for MOTORCITY

USPTO serial 77055315

MOTORCITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTORCITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

SCOTT J MAJOR MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD FL 14ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, blazers, track suits, hats and jacketsACTIVE
035Real estate services, namely, listing, leasing and managing of commercial and residential property; services relating to apartments, namely, leasing and management; real estate brokerage services; real estate and land acquisition; advisory, consulting and information services relating to all of the aforesaid servicesACTIVE
037Real estate development services; construction of commercial and residential properties; repair and maintenance services, including repair and maintenance services for commercial and residential properties; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to all of the aforesaid servicesACTIVE
041Educational service, namely, providing of training in the field of vehicle driving instructions; instruction and training in the field of automotive racing; entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting exhibitions for cultural and educational purposes in the field of motor car racingACTIVE
043Hotel services; restaurant servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 21, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 13, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 13, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 9, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 9, 2007PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST
Oct 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 7, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Dec 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance