USPTO serial 77056377
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Houston, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Houston, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Pierce
Jonathan Pierce Porter Hedges LLPP.O. Box 4744Houston, TX 77210-4744UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, valves being parts of machine tools that are used to regulate circulation in coiled tubing, connectors used to connect coiled tubing, and joints designed to withstand the torque of coiled tubing and slickline when joined together, all for use with wellbore conveyancing equipment such as coiled tubing and slicklines; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, jars and intensifiers used to deliver an impact force on toolstrings in order to free objects stuck in the borehole; machine tool parts used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, shock absorbers used to protect downhole tools during wireline operations; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, fishing tools in the nature of inside grappling claws, and force intensifiers and jars used to aid the recovery of lost downhole equipment; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, weight bars used to add weight to toolstrings and centralizers used to keep a tool string in the center of the tubing, casing, and wellbores; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, power-operated kick-over tools used to set and retrieve gas lift valves downhole; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, hangers in the nature of casing, instrument, liner, and tubing hangers on which downhole gauges and instruments are attached; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, submersible pumps, isolation sleeves used to isolate parts of casing and tubing string for maintenance, power-operated rope sockets used to attach machine tools to the wireline and slickline, motorhead assemblies on coiled tubing used to connect the coiled tubing to bottom hole assemblies, power-operated wash tools for cleaning the inside of tubing, power-operated toolstrings used for lowering tools into the well, power-operated tubing perforators used to perforate holes in tubing, conveying machine tools for setting, guiding, anchoring, locating, loosening, retrieving, and bypassing other downhole tools and mechanical devices in wellbores; machine tools used in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well, namely, bypass machine tools and parts therefor in the nature of Y-tools, bypass tubing, tubing clamps, telescopic swivel nipples, blanking plugs, and logging plugs, all used to access the wellbore below the electrical submersible pump | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Flow controllers in the nature of liquid flow regulators used in coiled tubing to control the flow of reservoir and completion fluids in a wellbore, all for use in completion and downhole intervention for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or stimulation of an existing well | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Service and repair of wireline, coiled tubing, and oilfield intervention equipment for the purposes of maintenance, repair, and stimulation of an existing well; rental of wireline equipment, coiled tubing equipment and oilfield intervention equipment for the purposes of maintenance, repair, and stimulation of an existing well | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others of downhole and oilfield intervention equipment used for the purposes of maintenance, repair, and stimulation of an existing well | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and engineering of downhole and oilfield intervention equipment that may be used for the purposes of maintenance, repair, and stimulation of an existing well | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |