USPTO serial 77062014
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Helle
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advice relating to the organisation and management of business; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Arranging and conducting business conferences; Assistance in management of business activities; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Business advice, inquiries or information; Business advisory services, consultancy and information; Business appraisal consultation; Business appraisals; Business consultation; Business consulting and information services; Business information in the field of fraud and corruption | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Business training; Computer education training; Education services namely, mentoring in the field of indicate subject matter or field(s); Education services namely, one-on-one mentoring in the field of fraud and corruption; Education services, namely, providing workshops, seminars, conferences, tutoring in the field of fraud and corruption; Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, seminars, conferences, tutoring in the field of fraud and corruption and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of fraud and corruption; Publishing of books and reviews; Publishing of books, magazines; Publishing of electronic publications; Publishing of web magazines; Videotape production | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Data conversion of computer program data or information; Duplicating computer programs; Duplication of computer programs; Updating of computer programs for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |