USPTO serial 77067886
THE PROVEN LEADER IN SMART IRRIGATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3266613Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE PROVEN LEADER IN SMART IRRIGATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Hughes, Esq.
JOHN A. HUGHES TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information services for others in the field of monitoring, gathering and analysis of weather data, and calculation of optimal irrigation on the basis of such analysis; agricultural and horticultural research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Agricultural and horticultural advice; advisory services in the field of irrigation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hydropoint Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hydropoint Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named THE PROVEN LEADER IN SMART IRRIGATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |