Drawing for AUTOMAX

USPTO serial 77076627

AUTOMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Passler

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR FUEL TREATMENT SOLD VIA DIRECT MARKETING AND THE INTERNETACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 16, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 2, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 2, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 4, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Sep 4, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 31, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 31, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 2, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 2, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 2, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jan 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance