Drawing for FIVE-STEP METHOD

USPTO serial 77077768

FIVE-STEP METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIVE-STEP METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Asplin

PATRICK C. ASPLIN LENHART OBENSHAIN100 10TH ST NE STE 300CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902-5481UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely providing on-line and live teaching, training and instruction to teachers, educators, and education administrators utilizing a five-step analysis of case studies designed to assist teachers, educators, and educational administrators to recognize and solve educational problems and issues; providing printed course and instructional materials in connection therewithACTIVESep 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 6, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 5, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance