USPTO serial 77077817
MINDBRIDGE OPEN SOURCED BUSINESS INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINDBRIDGE OPEN SOURCED BUSINESS INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE9TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, business process automation software, open source software, workflow enabled software, document management and collaboration software, information security automation software, salesforce automation software, customer service automation software, SOA/ESB-enabled software, and executive management and reporting software | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1996 |
| 042 | computer software development services, featuring product customization, integration and custom web application development; computer consulting services, namely, management of workgroup and enterprise software for others; computer maintenance support and training for others in the use of computer software | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |