USPTO serial 77078477
NOBLE JEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOBLE JEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric S. Hyman
ERIC S. HYMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP1279 OAKMEAD PARKWAYSUNNYVALE, CA 94085-4040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, jeans, pants, shirts, skirts, dresses and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AJH Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 4 WHAT IT'S WORTH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 4 WHAT IT'S WORTH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NOBLE JEANS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2010 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |