USPTO serial 77081787
CROSSWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROSSWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren Hall
WARREN HALL DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND STREET WESTSUITE 301TORONTO, ON M5H2L7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automated household and housekeeping products, namely, dishwashers, vacuum cleaners and washing machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |