USPTO serial 77082009
NOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randee Sibul-Gelbert
Randee Sibul-Gelbert Meitus Gelbert Rose LLP47 S. Meridian StreetSuite 400Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that interprets users descriptions of actions and dialogues and uses an animation engine to synthesize such input into animated images and refine them, all for the purpose of creating films, video programs and video presentations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |