Drawing for VIABLE SYSTEMS, INC.

USPTO serial 77083474

VIABLE SYSTEMS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3377248Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2008
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VIABLE SYSTEMS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William E. Hilton

WILLIAM E. HILTON GAUTHIER & CONNORS, LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 2300BOSTON, MA 02110-2898UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Laser cutting and engraving machines for use in manufacturing textiles and other woven and non-woven articles, namely, jacquard woven fabrics, denim, fleece, flock, twill, and felt; and laser cutting and engraving machines and related computer software, sold as a unit for use manufacturing textiles and other woven and non-woven articles, namely, jacquard woven fabrics, denim, fleece, flock, twill, and feltSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1974
009Software for use in laser processing equipment in manufacturing textiles and other woven and non-woven articles and for designing woven fabricsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1974

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Feb 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance