USPTO serial 77098315
CHESHIRE CAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHESHIRE CAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve W. Ackerman
Steve W. Ackerman The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal - Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0639Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, candy, cake decorations made of candy, chocolate, confectionery chips for baking, frozen confections, frozen yogurt, ice cream, ice milk, licorice, marshmallows, sherberts; bubble gum; chewing gum; breakfast cereals; oatmeal; preparations made from cereals, namely, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, cereal-based snack foods; bread; muffins; pastries; waffles; pancakes; pancake mixes; cookies; crackers; biscuits; popcorn; corn chips; pretzels; puddings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |