Drawing for TUFFBOND

USPTO serial 77099355

TUFFBOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUFFBOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bridget C. Heffernan

BRIDGET C. HEFFERNAN ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH ET AL255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801-3460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Adhesives for general household useACTIVEAug 21, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Aug 4, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 1, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 24, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Apr 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 8, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 8, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 8, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 6, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 6, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance