USPTO serial 77103849
WHY WAIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHY WAIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Progoff
SUSAN PROGOFF FISH & NEAVE IP GROUP, ROPES & GRAY LLP1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazine containing information, listings, articles and special features concerning television programming, celebrities, and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Television broadcasting services; television transmission services; distribution of television programming to cable and satellite television systems; distribution of television programs for others; cable television broadcasting; cable television transmission; satellite television broadcasting; satellite television transmission; information transmission via electronic communications networks; transmission of information through video communication systems; broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; wireless communications services, namely, transmission of text, graphics, and entertainment information to mobile telephones; mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; streaming of audio material on the Internet; streaming of video material and podcasts on the Internet; wireless broadband communication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of celebrities, entertainment reviews, and entertainment information; entertainment services, namely, providing television programs in the field of celebrities, entertainment reviews, and entertainment information via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of television shows and movies; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; television programming; television scheduling; production of television programs; mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of content preparation; provision of non-downloadable films and television programs via a video-on-demand service; providing television, cable, and satellite television listings, programming and scheduling information, advertisements and entertainment related information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |