USPTO serial 77105927
D R LEADTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with D R LEADTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
Miriam D. Trudell Davis Graham & Stubbs LLC3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700DENVER, CO 80205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER INTERFACE CARDS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; COMPUTER MOTHERBOARDS; GRAPHICS ACCELERATOR CARDS FOR COMPUTERS; VIDEO GRAPHICS ARRAY (VGA) CARDS FOR COMPUTERS; SOUND CARDS; VIDEO TELEPHONES; COMPUTERS; MODEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO CONTROL NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO ENHANCE THE AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, FOR THE INTEGRATION OF TEXT, AUDIO, GRAPHICS, STILL IMAGES AND MOVING PICTURES; TELEPHONES; COMPUTER NETWORK ROUTERS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS (GPS) CONSISTING OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, AND NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICES; SECURITY DEVICES, NAMELY, SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS, SURVEILLANCE VIDEO RECORDERS AND SURVEILLANCE VIDEO TRANSMITTERS FOR REMOTE MONITORING; SIGNAL CONVERTERS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS (GPS) ANTENNAS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS (GPS) RECEIVERS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS (GPS) TRANSMITTERS; VIDEO CONFERENCE APPARATUS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS; BIO-SIGNAL DETECTORS; BIO-SIGNAL RECEIVERS; BIO-SIGNAL PROCESSORS; BIO-SIGNAL RECORDERS; BIO CHIPS; INTERNET PROTOCOL (IP) CAMERAS | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |