CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WELL DONE

USPTO serial 77110939

WELL DONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELL DONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janelle M. Dease

Janelle M. Dease BORCHARD & CALLAHAN, APC25909 Pala, Suite 300Mission Viejo, CA 92691UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016(Based on Intent to Use) Printed award certificates; Printed awardsACTIVE—
041(Based on Use in Commerce) Awards program for major corporations and individuals who have made significant charitable contributions; Book and review publishing; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; Music publishing servicesACTIVEMay 30, 2007
042(Based on Intent to Use) Designing theme graphics and multimedia shows for conventions, product launches, trade shows, key note addresses and award ceremonies for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 8, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 19, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 19, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 19, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 4, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance