USPTO serial 77112173
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Rosenthal
ROBERT G. ROSENTHAL LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT G. ROSENTHAL5856 FARINGDON PL STE 200RALEIGH, NC 27609-3931UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Automatic telephone answering and screening services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Prepaid telephone calling card services; banking and related financial services, namely, providing bank account information by telephone, money transfer by telephone and global computer network, credit and debit card services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Automatic telephone forwarding services; telecommunications services, namely, electronic fax, data, and voice messaging service, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of fax, data, and voice message by fax, computer, and/or telephone | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic fax, data, and voice messaging services, namely, the storage and retrieval of fax, data, and voice messages | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2009 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |