Drawing for CELLPLUSPLUS

USPTO serial 77112173

CELLPLUSPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CELLPLUSPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert G. Rosenthal

ROBERT G. ROSENTHAL LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT G. ROSENTHAL5856 FARINGDON PL STE 200RALEIGH, NC 27609-3931UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Automatic telephone answering and screening servicesACTIVE—
036Prepaid telephone calling card services; banking and related financial services, namely, providing bank account information by telephone, money transfer by telephone and global computer network, credit and debit card servicesACTIVE—
038Automatic telephone forwarding services; telecommunications services, namely, electronic fax, data, and voice messaging service, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of fax, data, and voice message by fax, computer, and/or telephoneACTIVE—
039Telecommunications services, namely, electronic fax, data, and voice messaging services, namely, the storage and retrieval of fax, data, and voice messagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2009MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Nov 5, 2009ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 15, 2009IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Jul 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 10, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2008ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance