Drawing for PLAID

USPTO serial 77113125

PLAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3412392Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 15, 2008
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francis G. Pennarola

Francis G. Pennarola Chipman Mazzucco Land & Pennarola LLC30 Main Street, Suite 204Danbury, CT 06810UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing services; design of advertising materials for others; Advertising services, namely promoting the goods, services, and brand identity of third parties through print, audio, video, digital and on-line mediumSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2007
042Visual design services in the nature of designing visual elements for online, broadcast, printing, outdoor and other communication mediaSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Feb 26, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 19, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 5, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Mar 4, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 6, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 30, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 30, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 26, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 9, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance