USPTO serial 77117695
NEUROMED DEVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3625141Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2009
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEUROMED DEVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAKLEY, UT
OAKLEY, UT
OAKLEY, UT
OAKLEY, UT
LAS VEGAS, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryce K. Earl, Esq.
Bryce K. Earl, Esq. Cotton, Driggs, Walch, Holley, Woloson & Thompson400 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, THIRD FLOORLAS VEGAS, NV 89101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Product research and development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 3, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMED, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEUROMED, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEUROMED, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEUROMED, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Silverstone, Leon
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEUROMED DEVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |