Drawing for THE SIMPLE KITCHEN

USPTO serial 77120138

THE SIMPLE KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3763625Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 23, 2010
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SIMPLE KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Coploff

JEFFREY L COPLOFF TREVENEN & COPLOFF LLC18 TITUS ROADP O BOX 331WASHINGTON DEPOT, CT 06794

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail grocery and retail store services featuring foodSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 15, 2008
043Delicatessens; cafes; restaurants; cateringSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 15, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2015C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Aug 12, 2015CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 11, 2015CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
Jun 5, 2015PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 17, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 4, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Jan 19, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 25, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 25, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 26, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 24, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance