USPTO serial 77121654
C-FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C-FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reid Schmidt
Reid Schmidt 20/20 Law Group110, 7330 Fisher Street S.E.Calgary, T2H 2H8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, anoraks, aprons, ascots, baby bibs not of paper, bandannas, baseball shirts, baseball stockings, baseball uniforms, baseball caps, basketball uniforms, basketball jerseys, basketball socks, basketball shorts, basketball pants, beach coats, bib ties, bib overalls, blouses, body suits, booties, boots, bowling shirts, boxing trunks, caps, hats, berets, sport caps, golf caps, golf hats, visors, head bands, capes, coats, jackets, blazers, topcoats, waistcoats, parkas, ponchos, coveralls, football pants, football jackets, gloves, mittens, golf pants, golf shirts, golf jackets, golf shorts, gym shirts, gym shorts, gym pants, judo uniforms, jumpers, jumpsuits, lingerie, camisoles, negligees, foundation garments, namely, brassieres, panties, briefs, underwear, slips, garter belts, garters, lounge wear robes, sleepwear namely, night shirts, nightgowns, pajamas, bath wraps, bathrobes, dressing gowns, housecoats, kimonos, robes, wraparounds and wraps, thermal underwear, one-piece jumpsuits, pants, jeans, trousers, knickers, scrub pants, rugby pants, pullovers, rain ponchos, raincoats, rainsuits, storm suits, storm coats, wind protection jacket, sandals, sashes, scarves, shawls, jacket liners, shirts, dress shirts, tops, tank tops, jerseys, turtlenecks, knit shirts, smocks, rugby shirts, shorts, skirts, slacks, snow suits, snowmobile suits, soccer pants, soccer shirts, socks, hosiery, panty hose, leg warmers, leggings, leotards, sport shirts, stockings, suits, suspenders, sweat shirts, sweatband wristlets, sweaters, cardigans, sweat jackets, sweatpants, sweat shorts, sweat suits, jogging suits, track suits, swim pants, bikinis, swim trunks, halter tops, beach cover-ups, tennis pants, tennis shirts, tennis jackets, tennis shorts, ties, tights, track and field shirts, track and field pants, tunics, tuxedos, uniforms, vests, warm-up tops, warm-up suits, warm-up pants, shoes, boots, athletic shoes, jogging shoes, overshoes, pumps, rubber boots, sandals, slip-on shoes, slippers, thongs, toe rubbers, swim caps and toques | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | ornamental novelty pins; buttons, belt buckles; hair bows; shoe laces; and ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |