USPTO serial 77126409
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trevor P Schmidt
DICKSON M LUPO MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 NORTH TRYON STREETSUITE 4700CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4003| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | exterior window blinds made of metal; interior window shutters made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | electric nightlights, accent lighting for home interior and exterior, namely, table lamps, floor lamps, LED fixtures used for home interior and exterior lighting; portable lighting, namely, table lamps; electric cable lighting, namely, pendant lights; bath accessories, namely, faucets, sinks, toilets, toilet seats, shower heads, and hand-held shower heads | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | decorative boxes made of leather and imitations of leather used for home decorating purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | exterior window blinds made of non-metal; interior window shutters made of non-metal; flooring products, namely, wood flooring, laminate flooring, parquet flooring, vinyl flooring, marble flooring, ceramic floor tiles, wood floor tiles, laminate floor tiles, parquet floor tiles, vinyl floor tiles, marble tile, wood moldings, laminate moldings | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | picture frames; furniture; outdoor furnishings, household furnishings, namely, bathroom, kitchen, closet and garage organizers, storage racks and boxes, storage units, stackable storage units, display racks, bookshelves, drawer and shelf organizers, bathroom furniture, namely, vanities, medicine cabinets, corner shelf units, bath etageres, and furniture for bathroom storage, drapery hardware, namely, traverse rods, poles, curtain hooks, curtain rods, and finials, interior window blinds and shades; bar stool pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | tumblers, boutique tissue holders, towel bars and towel rings, home decorating supplies, namely, vases | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | knitted or non-woven fabrics composed from natural or man-made fibers or blends thereof used in the manufacture of home or commercial apparel and furnishing products in the nature of bed sheets, comforters, pillows, and upholstery; home textile products, namely, bed sheets, pillow cases, pillow covers, pillow shams, bed blankets, comforters, bedspreads, duvets, duvet covers, bed skirts, dust ruffles, mattress pads, fabric table toppers, tablecloths not of paper, fabric table runners, plastic, textile and vinyl place mats, textile napkins, kitchen towels, pot holders, towels, hand towels, wash cloths, fabric toilet seat covers, fabric toilet tank covers, shower curtains; window treatments, namely, draperies, curtains, fabric valances, swags, and fabric tie-backs, fitted fabric textile toilet lid covers; bath towels, wash cloths, shower curtains, shower curtain liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | carpet and rugs; wallpaper; bath mats, contour rugs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |