USPTO serial 77126644
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New Territories, HK
New Territories, HK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Sharpe
Richard A. Sharpe Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 E 9th Street, Suite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Radio control toy vehicles; radio control toy sports cars, racing cars, fire engines, ambulances, military vehicles, tanks; radio control toy construction/work vehicles, excavators, crane excavators, giant trucks, loaders, forklift trucks; radio control toy aeroplanes, helicopters, rockets, space shuttles, space ships, helium air ships, boats, submarines, trains; battery operated and infrared toy vehicles; battery operated and infrared toy sports cars, racing cars, fire engines, ambulances, military vehicles, tanks; battery operated and infrared toy construction/work vehicles, excavators, crane excavators, giant trucks, loaders, forklift trucks; battery operated and infrared toy aeroplanes, helicopters, rockets, space shuttles, space ships, helium air ships, boats, submarines, trains; battery operated and electric power road toy vehicle racing sets; battery operated and infrared toy train sets; battery operated toy water guns, bubble blowers, turboprops; battery operated and infrared toy guns; pinball games; toy appliances, namely, toy washing machines, toy dish washers, and toy vacuum cleaners; play sets for toy vehicles; dolls and play figures; die-cast toy vehicles and toy train sets; toy building blocks; battery operated propeller-driven toy aircrafts; model toys, namely, model toy cooking utensils for toy household appliances; toy buildings | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |