USPTO serial 77136768
SIMPLY DIAMONDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLY DIAMONDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
URSULA B. DAY LAW FIRM OF URSULA B. DAY708 THIRD AVE STE 1501NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OPERATING ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC MACHINES FOR GAMING, GAMBLING AND AMUSEMENT PURPOSES; ACCOUNTING APPARATUS FOR COIN AND TOKEN OPERATED MACHINES FOR GAMING, GAMBLING AND AMUSEMENT PURPOSES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS; GAMING MACHINES WITH AND WITHOUT VIDEO OUTPUT; BETTING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC STAND ALONE GAME MACHINES FEATURING GAMES, SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT THEMES OPERABLE WITH CURRENCY OR CURRENCY VALUE EQUIVALENTS; GAMING MACHINES WITH OR WITHOUT VIDEO OUTPUT; BETTING MACHINES; ALL THE FOREGOING MACHINES OPERABLE AS INDIVIDUALLY OPERATED MACHINES OR OPERABLE IN A NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF CASINO SERVICES FEATURING A PROGRESSIVE GAMING MACHINE JACKPOT INVOLVING ONE OR MORE GAMING MACHINES, NAMELY, A JACKPOT OR PRIZE WITH A FIXED MINIMUM VALUE WHICH INCREASES UNTIL THE JACKPOT IS WON | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SIMPLY DIAMONDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |