Drawing for XTHETIX

USPTO serial 77152188

XTHETIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTHETIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa A. Smith

Lisa A. Smith Alticor Inc.7575 Fulton Street East78-2MAda, MI 49355

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin lotions; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; therapeutic skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin lotionsACTIVE
005Therapeutic skin care products, namely, medicated skin lotions, and medicinal creams for skin careACTIVE
010Therapeutic skin care devices, namely, ultrasound apparatus for cosmetic treatment of face and skin and for treatment of a variety of skin conditions; ultrasound therapy apparatus for creating of thermal damage and healing of such tissue, and for skin tightening, skin firming, skin lifting, and treatment of acne, non-invasive cosmetic damage and healing of such tissue, and for skin tightening, skin firming, skin lifting, and treatment of acneACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 12, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 13, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 12, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Oct 16, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 14, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 7, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 6, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 1, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 10, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 6, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
May 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance