USPTO serial 77154621
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yeon Yi Cha
Yeon Yi Cha Paradigm IP LLP130 King Street West, The Exchange TowerSuite 1800Toronto, M5X 1E3| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Parking meters; multi-space machines, namely, automated stand alone parking meters for motor vehicle parking lot management, namely, a parking meter which receives payment via smart card or coin and tracks the allocation of individual parking spaces within a defined geographic area; smart cards, namely, pre-programmed cards purchased for payment of parking fees; metering devices, namely, electronic timers connected to the parking meter to determine payment due for duration of parking and smart card readers; traffic equipment, namely, automatic security lift gates for entry and exit and smart card acceptance devices, namely, electronic parking meters which receive payment for parking; pay and display machines, namely, automated stand alone parking meters for motor vehicle parking lot management, namely, a parking meter which receives payment via smart card or coin, issues receipt and authorization tickets and tracks the allocation of parking services within a defined geographic area; computer software for gathering and compiling data in the field of motor vehicle parking relating to real time use of motor vehicle parking facility in respect of the use of parking meters by time and location, and use of motor vehicle parking facilities by time and location; computers, computer peripherals, namely, hand held scanning units and built-in cameras; computer software for controlling payments for parking permits and granting parking permits; electronic visual display device, namely, an electronic parking meter for displaying a parking permit in response to a signal from a computer network attached electronically via computer software to the electronic parking meter; computer communication servers for the operation and management of parking meters, automated parking entry gates and barriers, automated parking exit gates and barriers, automated parking payment stations, vehicle counters and signage for parking facilities and for the printing and/or electronic transmission and control of tickets for automated parking meters and payment stations; wired and wireless devices, namely, telephones and computer modems for monitoring and control of automated parking meters and payment stations and for communication with and collection of data, namely, fees collected for parking or amount of parking infractions issued due to non-payment of parking fees from automated parking meters and payment stations; machines, namely, hand held parking meters and hand held computers for facilitating prepayment for parking permits, tolls and other motoring services, namely, payment monitoring of motor vehicles for parking purposes; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, stationary parking meters and hand held computers for facilitating prepayment for parking permits, tolls and other motoring services, namely, payment monitoring of motor vehicles for parking purposes via telecommunications, and parts and fittings thereof for all the aforesaid goods; coin acceptance, discrimination and validation devices, namely, mechanical and electrical parking meter components for automated vending and metering devices, namely, parking meters, which components facilitate the acceptance of, tabulation of and storage of authorized and valid coins deposited for the purpose of purchasing parking time at specific parking meters; automated parking meter systems for use in garages and meter vehicle parking facilities for supervising, controlling and checking ingress, egress, space allotment and storage of vehicles, consisting of automated parking entry gates and barriers, automated parking exit gates and barriers, automated parking payment stations, namely, computer hardware that automatically dispenses tickets in paper or electronic format and that automatically accepts payments, vehicle counters, illuminated electric signage for parking facilities, video systems, namely, video cameras and video monitors for monitoring parking facilities, and video and/or voice systems, namely, cameras, microphones, video monitors and speakers for communicating with customers and for providing customer assistance in parking garages all sold together as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management of motor vehicle parking facilities; business management services for the parking industry, and developing marketing opportunities in the parking industry for third parties, namely, providing business consulting services to third parties for determining parking fees and fines for automatic payment; undertaking utilization business analyses in the parking industry for third parties, namely, monitoring and auditing fees collected for parking in specific geographic areas | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |