CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LECO

USPTO serial 77155290

LECO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LECO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. May

DAVID L. MAY NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Jams, whipped cream, meat extracts, fruit jellies, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins for food, marmalade, jellies for food, yogurt, milk products, namely, milk, butter, butter cream, peanut butter, chocolate nut butter, cocoa butter for food purposes, coconut butter, margarine, kefir, milk beverage containing fruit, cheese, rennet, milk cream, condensed milk, rice milk products, namely, rice milk for use as a milk substitute, powdered milk for food purposes, garlic butter, meat pastes, egg and meat pâté, pâté, fish pâté, requeijão, a type of curd cheeseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 27, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 26, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 13, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 25, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 27, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance