USPTO serial 77155947
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rawtenstall Lancashire, GB
Rawtenstall Lancashire, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Salter
ROBERT SALTER SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN ST STE 501PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-7114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for secure electronic messaging and data transfer; computer hardware and software for secure transmission of data through communications networks; computer hardware and software for encryption, decryption and authentication of electronic transactions and communications; telecommunications equipment and apparatus, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating messages and data communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; telephones and mobile telephones; mobile data receivers; receivers for receiving messages and data via communications networks; receivers for receiving messages and data by satellite or cable transmission | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, secure transmission of electronic messages and data; providing electronic transmission of credit card transaction data and electronic payment data via a global computer network; services of secure messaging through communications networks; secure electronic messaging; electronic transmission of data featuring encryption and decryption; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to any of the aforesaid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computing services relating to the field of data security, namely, services of data encryption, decryption and authentication of electronic transactions and communications; authentication of messages and data sent electronically; encryption and decryption of electronic messages and data sent over a communications network; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to any of the aforesaid; on-line security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |