USPTO serial 77157732
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
Candiac, CA
Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
Candiac, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
Candiac, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by MAJOR WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD./LES INDUSTRIES FIL METALLIQUE MAJOR LTEE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Cupar
David B. Cupar McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenue, EastSuite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Screening grates made of a wire mesh of straight wires, pre-crimped wires, undulated wires of metal and crimped wires generally made of metal or metal alloys or plastic or composites or a combination of these materials and of a frame made of metal, namely, steel, aluminum or frame made of plastic, namely, polyurethane, rubber or any other synthetic materials or a combination of any of the previous materials for use for sieving, filtering and sifting rocks, sand, gravel, minerals, products for composting or composted products, products for recycling or recycled products, top soil, mulch, any other materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 21, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |