Drawing for TRACKSTAR

USPTO serial 77157917

TRACKSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRACKSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Mattson

BRIAN M. MATTSON PATENTS+TMS, P.C.2849 W ARMITAGE AVECHICAGO, IL 60647-3967UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Consumer electronics devices for organizing, receiving, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, and media files related to music, namely, mobile phones and media players; computer software, for use in organizing, receiving, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, and media files related to music on consumer electronics devicesACTIVE
038Communication services, related to music, in the nature of electronic transmission of text, data and media content; streaming of audio and video material on the InternetACTIVE
042Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining consumer applications, software, websites, and guides in the fields of media, information and entertainment access, related to music, on consumer electronics devices, and remote data management for delivery of content to consumer electronics devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 31, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance