Drawing for MCC QPLUS

USPTO serial 77158587

MCC QPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MCC QPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frederick W. Meyers

FREDERICK W. MEYERS LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Portable media players; personal digital assistants; set-top boxes; smart phones; telematics terminals, namely, portable media player (PMP) and global positioning system (GPS) navigator; robot embedded system comprising mobile processor with network devices; wearable personal computers; medical embedded system comprising mobile processor with device interfaces; vehicle embedded system comprising multimedia processors; and air-vehicle embedded system comprising control processorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 21, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance