USPTO serial 77158629
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Goldschmidt, Jr.
JOHN W. GOLDSCHMIDT, JR. DILWORTH PAXSON LLP1735 MARKET STREET3200 MELLON BANK CENTERPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7595| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and providing training courses to others in the field of offering for sale, selling, and servicing retirement and investment accounts; training in the field of investment plan sales, management and administration | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |