Drawing for DICE-K/DAISUKE

USPTO serial 77158779

DICE-K/DAISUKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICE-K/DAISUKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. Eichler, Esq.

PETER M. EICHLER, ESQ. JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C.16427 N SCOTTSDALE RD STE 300SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254-1597UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cereal, cereal bars, and grain, rice, and wheat-based snack barsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 5, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 4, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance