USPTO serial 77158780
LIBERTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIBERTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia R. Richard
VIRGINIA R. RICHARD WINSTON & STRAWN LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) transportation logistics, namely, arranging the transportation of goods for others via marine shipping | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | (Based on Use in Commerce) transportation services, namely, cargo ship transport and operation of vessels engaged in marine shipping; cargo vessel transport; freight ship transport | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liberty Shipping Group LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Liberty Shipping Group LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named LIBERTY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |