Drawing for DIANA DELICATE

USPTO serial 77159540

DIANA DELICATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIANA DELICATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence Apolzon,

Lawrence Apolzon, FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PerfumeACTIVE
020MattressesACTIVE
024Bedding, namely, bed linens, bed sheets, pillow shams, bed blankets; comforters; duvet covers, pillow covers, mattress coversACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, bandanas, bathing suits, bathrobes, beachwear, belts, baby bibs not of paper, bikinis, blazers, blouses, body suits, camisoles, cardigans, coats, dresses, evening wear, tuxedos, dinner jackets, bowties, cummerbunds, vests, gowns, gloves, halter tops, infant wear, jackets, jeans, leg warmers, leggings, leotards, lingerie, neckties, pajamas, pants, polo shirts, pull-overs, rainwear, scarves, shirts, sports shirts, shorts, skirts, slacks, sleepwear, suits, sweaters, swimwear, sweatbands, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweatsuits, t-shirts, tank tops, tops, turtlenecks, underwear, uniforms, vests, wraps, wristbands, hosiery, socks, athletic footwear, boots, footwear, shoes, slippers, sneakers, baseball caps, berets, hats, headbands, headwear, visorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 29, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 25, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance