USPTO serial 77159639
ALF-X SOFAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4156105Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2012
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALF-X SOFAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trezzano Rosa (MI), IT
Trezzano Rosa (MI), IT
20135 Milan, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
Michael A. Grow ARENT FOX PLLC1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for tele-operating manipulator arms using move commands issued by haptic master arms generating tactile feedback; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for filtering and geometrically transforming move commands issued by haptic master arms generating tactile feedback and sensors mounted on manipulator arms and on haptic master arms generating tactile feedback; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for detecting real time movement or pressure by sensors mounted on manipulators and haptic master arms generating tactile feedback; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for setting-up and calibrating sensors and manipulator arms; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for facilitating real-time communication between computers; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for graphical user interfaces; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for simulating manipulator arm behavior and surgical instruments interaction with tissues; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for programming procedures to change instruments, inserting instruments in the patient body and manually operating manipulating arms through sensory information; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for signaling abnormal forces applied on tissues, detecting electrical and mechanical faults and software and hardware failures, and signaling collisions between manipulator arms and between the arm and a human operator; computer hardware and computer software all for use with remote tele-surgical procedures for recording in real time data from sensors, manipulator arms and haptic master arms generating tactile feedback | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical equipment for use in remote tele-surgical procedures, namely, robotic manipulator arms mounted on a movable base, equipped with actuators for surgical instruments and with sensors for detecting pressure or force, for detecting and identifying surgical instruments, and for detecting personnel safety; medical equipment for use during surgical procedures, namely, haptic master arms with foot switches for generating tactile feedback; medical electronic equipment and surgical instruments, namely, surgical drapes, trocars, medical biopsy brushes, laparoscopes, endoscopes, ultrasound probes, electro-cautery tools, clip appliers and clips, tack appliers and tacks, cannulae, scalpels, scalpel blades, dissectors, forceps scissors, clamps, graspers, staplers, heaters and calibrators, insufflators, suction probes, irrigation probes, needle holders and ligature carriers all for use in remote surgical procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software used in the medical and scientific fields and used with apparatus for remote controlled surgery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sofar S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Sofar S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Sofar S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALF-X SOFAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |