USPTO serial 77159846
CLARITY LEGAL SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLARITY LEGAL SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darin M. Klemchuk
DARIN M. KLEMCHUK CASH KLEMCHUK POWERS TAYLOR LLP8150 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 1575DALLAS, TX 75206-1837UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software, namely, software for use with the management, editing, presenting, and sharing of litigation materials for use by the legal profession | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2006 |
| 041 | Providing online training services, namely, providing classes on how to use computer software used by the legal profession | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |