USPTO serial 77160358
PFESIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PFESIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JP
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JP
RENESAS ELECTRONICS KABUSHIKI KAISHA (RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION)
KAWASAKI, KANAGAWA, JP
Other trademarks owned by RENESAS ELECTRONICS KABUSHIKI KAISHA (RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
Gary D. Krugman SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors, optical semiconductors, microwave semiconductors, compound semiconductors, diodes, transistors, gallium arsenide field-effect transistors, standard cells, integrated circuits, integrated circuit packages, application specific integrated circuits (ASICS), hybrid integrated circuits, large scale integration chips (LSI), programmable integrated circuits, namely, gate arrays, computer memories, micro computers, microcontrollers, computer memories, namely, read only memories (ROMS), random access memories (RAMS), static random access memories (SRAMS), dynamic random access memories (DRAMS), programmable read only memories (PROMS), erasable programmable read only memories (EPROMS), electrically erasable programmable read only memories (EEPROMS), and field programmable read only memories (FPROMS), microcomputers, central processing units (CPUS), charge-coupled devices (CCDS), printed wiring boards (PWBS), capacitors, variable resistors, computer keyboards, electrical connectors, computer software for use in designing integrated circuits, electric relays, electroluminescent lighting panels, liquids crystal displays, light emitting diode displays, computer connecting boards and electrical connectors for use in conjunction with computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RENESAS ELECTRONICS KABUSHIKI KAISHA (RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PFESIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |