Drawing for TRUSTEDSOURCE

USPTO serial 77160823

TRUSTEDSOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUSTEDSOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara J. Grahn, Esq.

BARBARA J. GRAHN, ESQ. OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP45 S 7TH ST STE 3300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1650UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware for providing security for email, internet and other electronic communications, for identifying and blocking potentially dangerous or undesirable electronic communications and content, for identifying and blocking electronic communications from illegitimate sources, and for identifying and blocking computer and electronic mail viruses, spam, zombies, and other undesirable contentACTIVEJun 7, 2004
042Providing computer and information technology security services, namely, developing, updating, maintaining and providing online databases of illegitimate sources of electronic communications and sources of computer and email viruses, spam, spyware, adware and malwareACTIVEJun 7, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 2, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 2, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 15, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 23, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 30, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 30, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 2, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 2, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 13, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance