USPTO serial 77161664
SCHÄR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHÄR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burgstall/Postal, IT
Burgstall/Postal, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Schulman
LORI S SCHULMAN SCHULMAN LEGAL SERVICES PLLC11654 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE#751RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Low-protein, gluten-free, dietetic foods adapted for medical use, and dietetic foods for diabetics adapted for medical use, namely, biscuits, bread, bread crumbs, bread rolls, bread sticks, cakes, sponge cakes, cereal products, crackers, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, cereal-based snack-foods, flour mix, pizza | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Low-protein, gluten-free, dietetic foods, namely, biscuits, breads, bread crumbs, bread rolls, bread sticks, cakes, sponge cakes, cereal products, namely, breakfast cereal, crackers, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, cereal-based snack-foods, flour mix, pizza | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |