Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77161827?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77161827. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77161827, the listed owner(s) include: MD, Joel L. Marmar.

What is USPTO serial number 77161827?

Serial number 77161827 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY?

I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY (77161827) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY?

The public record lists International Classes: 010, 044. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77161827

I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Apr 20, 2007
Status date: Nov 9, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-LV IN-LINE VASECTOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

MD, Joel L. Marmar
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by MD, Joel L. Marmar

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, L.L.C.TWO LIBERTY PLACE50 SOUTH 16TH STREET 22ND FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
010	Kit containing medical clamps, skin hooks, scissors and a disposable electric cautery	ACTIVE	—
044	Medical services	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 9, 2010	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 9, 2010	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 9, 2010	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 20, 2010	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Nov 25, 2009	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Nov 25, 2009	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Nov 25, 2009	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Oct 22, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 9, 2009	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 9, 2009	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 9, 2009	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jul 7, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 6, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 6, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Aug 21, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 21, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 18, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Apr 20, 2008	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 20, 2008	GECG	ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 20, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 3, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 3, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 3, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 1, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Apr 1, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 1, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 1, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Mar 12, 2008	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Oct 1, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Oct 1, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 23, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 23, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 26, 2007	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Apr 25, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—