USPTO serial 77161831
JUK YEOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUK YEOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin milk lotion; perfumes; Cleaning cream; Bath soaps; Lipsticks; Facial essence in the nature of essential oils; Hair shampoos; Eye shadows; Toothpaste; General toilet water; Hair colorants; hand and body soap in powder form; Pre-moistened cosmetic tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Liquid soaps; Non-medicated bath, and beauty care cosmetics with elecampane; Hair rinse; Hair spray; Hair mousse; Hair essence in the nature of perfumed oils for hair; Sun screen lotion; Depilatory preparations for hair; Color-removing preparations for hair; Non-medicated mouth washes; Non-medicated dental rinses; Foundation cream makeup; Cheek colors, namely, blush; Blushers; Eye liner; Nail polish; Nourishing non-medicated skin cream; Nail polish remover; Beauty masks; Beauty mask pack comprised of facial exfoliant, facial moisturizer, and facial toner; Toilet soaps; Baby oil; Lip gloss; Lip balm; Massage cream; Body lotion; hair gel; Non-medicated protective preparations for lips; After shave lotion; Shaving foam; Shaving cream; Deodorants for personal use; Aromatics other than for medical purposes, namely, fragrances for personal use; Lavender oil; Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Mint for perfumery; Vanilla perfumery; Hair removal agent, namely, hair removing cream; Bath gel; Shower gel; Body scrub; Massage oil; Tooth whitener; Nourishing skin cream; Liquid rouge; Mascara; Massage gel; Enamel for manicure; Varnish-removing preparations; Badian essence for cosmetic use; Vanishing creams; Bath oil; Bath powder; Baby powder; Perfumed powder; Dandruff lotions, not for medical treatment; Dandruff creams, not for medical treatment; Bath salts, not for medical purposes; Cosmetic sun milk; Sunscreen creams; Cosmetic sun oils; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Nail colorants; Cosmetic skin fresheners; Eye make-up removers; Eau de cologne; Lip primers; Non-medicated lip conditioners; Cold creams; Solid powder for compacts; Depilatory wax; Permanent wave preparations; Neutralizers for permanent waving; Face powder for cosmetics; Skin whitening creams; Hand creams; Hair glaze; Hair dressings; Hair lacquers; Hair lotions; Hair moisturizers; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair tonic; Make-up powder; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Body cream; Skin cleansing foams; Skin cleansing lotions; Lip pencils; Shower colorant; Eau de toilet; Non-medicated toilet water for removing horny substance, namely, for removing scaly skin; Non-medicated creams for removing horny substance, namely, for removing scaly skin; Essences, namely, concentrated liquid in the nature of essential oils for cosmetics; Cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes, namely, creams for cellulite reduction; Adhesives for affixing false hair; Adhesives for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic soaps; Paper soaps; Cream soaps; Body cleansers; Shaving soap; Soap for foot perspiration; Deodorant soap; Almond soap; Medicated soap; Breath freshening sprays; Tooth powders; Films impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Cosmetic films for removing oil; Cosmetic paper for removing oil; Tooth whitening patch; Preparations for cleaning dentures; all of the aforementioned goods containing salt roasted in bamboo; False eyelashes; False nails; Fabric softeners for laundry use; Antistatic preparations for household purposes, namely, anti-static dryer sheets, anti-static spray for clothing; Detergents prepared from petroleum for household cleaning use; Rinse in the form of detergent for clothing; Toilet bowl detergents; Dishwashing detergents; Fumigation preparations, namely, fumigating incenses; Bleaching agents for laundry use; Cleansers for laundry use; Potpourri perfumes; Incense sticks; Cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; Degreasing preparations for household purposes; Rust removing preparations; Floor wax removers; Drains preparations, namely, drain openers; Glass cleaning preparations; Windscreen cleaning liquids; Shoe polish; Polishing wax; Emery boards; Abrasive cloth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |