Drawing for DE LA RUE AUTHENTICATOR SERIES

USPTO serial 77161958

DE LA RUE AUTHENTICATOR SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DE LA RUE AUTHENTICATOR SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Currency management computer software for receiving, tracking, counting, inventory of and disbursement of cash or other documents of value; software for managing cash handling systems, account reconciliation and monitoring and controlling cash handling systems, account reconciliation and monitoring and controlling cash handling systems; apparatus, instruments and machines for dispensing, depositing, counting, sorting and recycling currency, cheques, vouchers, coupons and tickets, namely, cash dispensers, automated cash dispensers, cash currency counting machines, currency recognition machines, currency sorting machines, automated teller machines, cash recyclers; coin and banknote dispensers, counters, sorters, depositors and recyclers, namely, cash dispensers, automated cash dispenses, cash currency counting machines, currency recognition machines, currency sorting machines, automated teller machines, cash recyclers; replacement parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
May 15, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 15, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 15, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Feb 11, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 12, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Mar 20, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 13, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance