USPTO serial 77162793
HIGH HAND HOLD'EM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH HAND HOLD'EM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hillsdale, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John G. Tutunjian
JOHN G. TUTUNJIAN KEUSEY, TUTUNJIAN & BITETTO, P.C.20 CROSSWAYS PARK DR N STE 210WOODBURY, NY 11797-2007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game software and computer gaming software that generates or displays wager outcomes of real or virtual gaming machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Card games; playing cards; poker tables and poker table mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely providing live games of chance, card tournaments including poker games in gaming establishments and casinos; operation of a website providing online and mobile gaming in the nature of card games, namely poker card games; poker game discussion and markerting of card playing accessories, namely, playing cards, poker tables, poker mats, playing card boxes and rule books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |